We had three more Kotei this weekend, with full data available from all of them – some premier west coast players continue to roll with Mantis, Lion finally picks up a non-Ancestors Kotei win, Dragon avoids going a third weekend in a row without a W (but Crab does not), and Crane slides further after a big turnout in California without anyone in the cut.
Emperor Edition Environment | ||||||
Players | % of Field | Made Cut | Won | % Made Cut | Chi-Square Standard Residual | |
Crab | 333 | 14.7% | 89 | 7 | 26.7% | 2.39 |
Crane | 194 | 8.6% | 19 | 0 | 9.8% | -3.35 |
Dragon | 240 | 10.6% | 56 | 9 | 23.3% | 0.88 |
Lion | 281 | 12.4% | 69 | 5 | 24.6% | 1.40 |
Mantis | 235 | 10.4% | 48 | 6 | 20.4% | -0.11 |
Phoenix | 241 | 10.6% | 56 | 3 | 23.2% | 0.84 |
Scorpion | 286 | 12.6% | 58 | 4 | 20.3% | -0.18 |
Spider | 200 | 8.8% | 24 | 1 | 12.0% | -2.72 |
Unicorn | 230 | 10.1% | 46 | 3 | 20.0% | -0.25 |
Unaligned | 29 | 1.3% | 2 | 6.9% | ||
2269 | 467 | 20.0% | 12.5 |
Make the Cut Rankings
1) Crab – 27%
2) Lion – 25%
3) Dragon – 23%
4) Phoenix – 23%
5) Mantis – 20%
6) Scorpion – 20%
AVERAGE – 20%
7) Unicorn – 20%
8 ) Spider – 12%
9) Crane – 10%
What Kotei do you have Spider listed as winning?
As discussed in the first EE stat update, the Emperor Edition environment included a small number of pre-Kotei storyline tournaments. I have included the data from those tournaments as well (where the data is available), as there is no reason to exclude them from a statistical analysis of the Emperor Edition environment simply because they aren’t Kotei.
With regards to the Spider win, a Spider deck won the Nuremberg Imperial Explorers tournament.
This is the tournament where Daigotsu Bofana was the choice, as a note.
Hmmm . . . looks like I need to change the settings as “comment imported from blog” isn’t exactly as helpful as actually importing the comment from the blog. The data includes the handful of pre-Kotei Emperor-legal storyline tournaments, one of which was one by Spider.